“When I am glancing at a girl, I first looking at her legs,” said male A.
“I am first attracted by her face,” said male B.
“I am first looking for the unity of her,” said male C.
“The girl who just passed by, what grade you will give her?” asked A.
“90,” said C.
“Your criteria, your appreciation of beauty is really strange and inconsistent,” said A.
“It is intrinsically subjective,” said C, he found that it’s difficult to grade, to quantify, or to judge how beauty a girl is to him.
“And you?” told A to B.
“I think she’s OK, she has a good looking,” replied B.
C felt that it’s unnecessary, time-wasting, and unnatural to grade a person. He thought that it required a certain amount of effort to do that, and the effort spent but results nothing meaningful. He wandered why guys liked to grade girls who just showed in their sights? Was it for finding commonality among them? What was the commonality for? Was it for defining a prevalent standard? What were beauty contests for? Were they for identifying normality and a standard which accorded with the subjects of the judgments, the ones who were in charge of power?
沒有留言:
張貼留言